NM Law

Menu

Blog

Your blog category

THE USE OF FORENSIC ACCOUNTING IN WHITE-COLLAR CRIME INVESTIGATIONS

Leave a Comment / Banking & Finance, Blog, Corporate & Start Ups /

– Somya Saxena, Associate White-collar crime refers to financially motivated, non-violent crimes committed by individuals, businesses, or government officials. In India, the rise of economic offenses, such as financial fraud, corporate scandals, and tax evasion, has necessitated the use of forensic accounting as a critical investigative tool. With increasing financial irregularities in banking, corporate, and government sectors, forensic accounting plays a pivotal role in maintaining transparency and accountability in financial systems. What is Forensic Accounting? Forensic accounting is a specialized field of accounting that involves investigating financial records, detecting fraud, and providing legal support in criminal and civil cases. It merges accounting, auditing, and investigative skills to uncover financial discrepancies and provide evidence in legal proceedings. The Reserve Bank of India (RBI), the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI), and other regulatory bodies rely on forensic accountants to detect financial crimes and enhance corporate governance. Recent Developments and Cases In a landmark decision, the Delhi High Court mandated an Amazon unit to pay $39 million in damages for infringing on the “Beverly Hills Polo Club” trademark. This ruling not only emphasizes the judiciary’s stance on protecting intellectual property rights but also highlights the necessity for meticulous financial scrutiny in ecommerce operations. Another significant case involves allegations against the Adani Group. U.S. authorities have charged members of the Adani family with orchestrating a $265 million bribery scheme to secure energy contracts in India. Forensic accountants have been instrumental in unraveling the complex financial transactions underpinning these allegations, showcasing the indispensable nature of forensic investigations in such high-profile cases. To bolster the fight against financial misconduct, the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI) introduced the Forensic Accounting and Investigation Standards (FAIS), effective from July 1, 2023. These standards provide a structured framework for professionals, ensuring consistency and integrity in forensic accounting practices. By adhering to FAIS, auditors and investigators can enhance the reliability of their findings, thereby strengthening the overall financial reporting ecosystem in India. Role of Forensic Accounting in White-Collar Crime Investigations in India Key Techniques Used in Forensic Accounting Notable White-Collar Crime Cases in India and Related Case Laws Challenges in Forensic Accounting in India Future of Forensic Accounting in India With rising financial crimes and corporate frauds, forensic accounting will play a crucial role in safeguarding the Indian economy. Government initiatives such as the Fugitive Economic Offenders Act, 2018, and digital forensic advancements will enhance the effectiveness of financial investigations. Increased collaboration between forensic experts, law enforcement agencies, and regulatory bodies will strengthen fraud detection and prevention mechanisms. Conclusion Forensic accounting is an essential tool in white-collar crime investigations in India. By leveraging advanced investigative techniques, forensic accountants help uncover fraud, support legal proceedings, and enhance corporate governance. As economic offenses continue to evolve, forensic accounting will remain vital in ensuring financial integrity and legal accountability in India’s corporate and banking sectors.

THE USE OF FORENSIC ACCOUNTING IN WHITE-COLLAR CRIME INVESTIGATIONS Read More »

Ethical Considerations in the Use of Technology in Litigation

Leave a Comment / Blog, Legal Updates /

Technology has completely reshaped the way litigation is handled, making legal research, case management, and evidence presentation more efficient than ever before. With tools like artificial intelligence (AI), electronic discovery (e-discovery), anddigital communication, lawyers can now work faster and more effectively. But withthese advancements come serious ethical concerns—confidentiality, accuracy, fairness, and professional responsibility are all at stake. Legal professionals need to be mindful of these challenges to uphold justice and preserve the integrity of the legal system. 1. Confidentiality and Data Security Confidentiality is one of the most fundamental principles in legal ethics. With so much client data stored and shared digitally, the risk of security breaches is real. To protect sensitive information, lawyers should: • Use encrypted communication channels and secure cloud storage. • Implement multi-factor authentication to keep unauthorized users out. • Stay compliant with data protection laws like the GDPR and India’s Information Technology Act, 2000. • Educate their teams and clients about cybersecurity best practices. 2. Staying Up to Date with Legal Technology Lawyers have a duty to keep up with the latest technology. This means: • Understanding how AI-powered research tools work and their limitations. • Keeping pace with blockchain, predictive analytics, and digital forensics. • Fact-checking AI-generated legal arguments to ensure accuracy. 3. Digital Evidence and the Risk of Deepfakes Technology has made digital evidence an essential part of many cases, but it also brings new risks. Deepfakes—AI-generated content that manipulates audio, video, or images— could be used to introduce false evidence. To avoid this: • Lawyers need to carefully verify digital evidence before presenting it in court. • Forensic tools should be used to check for alterations or manipulation. • Courts need stricter guidelines on the admissibility of AI-generated content. 4. The Dangers of AI Bias in Legal Decisions AI can help predict case outcomes, recommend sentences, and analyze legal documents, but these systems are only as good as the data they’re trained on. If the data is biased, the results will be too. To ensure fairness: • Lawyers should critically analyze AI-generated legal insights. • Transparency in AI decision-making processes should be prioritized. • AI tools should always be used with human oversight. 5. Ethical Use of Social Media in Litigation Social media is a goldmine for evidence, but lawyers must use it ethically. That means: • Avoiding deceptive tactics, like creating fake profiles to gather information. • Respecting client confidentiality and avoiding public discussions of cases. • Thinking about the potential consequences of online statements. 6. The Risk of Unauthorized Legal Practice Through AI AI-driven legal tools are becoming more common, but there’s a fine line between using technology for assistance and relying on it for actual legal advice. Lawyers should: • Ensure that AI-powered tools don’t cross into unauthorized legal practice. • Make sure clients understand that AI can’t replace a qualified attorney. • Follow all professional regulations regarding legal automation. 7. Ensuring AI-Generated Legal Content is Reliable Lawyers have faced penalties for submitting AI-generated legal documents with fake citations. This highlights the need for: • Verifying all AI-generated legal research before using it. • Cross-checking citations with primary sources. • Being mindful that AI tools are fallible and require human oversight. 8. Maintaining Professional Integrity in Tech-Driven Litigation The duty of candor extends to technology use in legal practice. Lawyers should: • Disclose when AI-generated content is used in court filings if necessary. • Ensure all electronic submissions comply with procedural rules. • Prevent AI misuse that could compromise legal integrity. Conclusion: Technology is transforming litigation in ways that make legal work more efficient and accessible. However, the ethical concerns that come with it—data security, AI bias, deepfake evidence, and more—can’t be ignored. Lawyers have a responsibility to balance technological innovation with professional integrity, ensuring that justice is served without compromising ethical standards. By staying informed, exercising caution, and upholding the core values of the legal profession, they can make the most of legal technology while preserving the integrity of the law.

Ethical Considerations in the Use of Technology in Litigation Read More »

DEEPFAKE LITIGATION: LEGAL CHALLENGES IN IDENTIFYING & PROSECUTING AIGENERATED FRAUD

Leave a Comment / Blog, Tech & AI /

LEGAL CHALLENGES IN IDENTIFYING & PROSECUTING AI-GENERATED FRAUD Deepfakes-AI-generated videos, images, or audio-are becoming a serious legal and security threat. They can be used for fraud, misinformation, identity theft, and even political manipulation. As technology advances, legal systems struggle to keep pace with AI-driven deception. Identifying, proving, and prosecuting deepfake crimes presents new challenges for law enforcement and courts worldwide. Let’s explore the key hurdles in deepfake litigation. WHAT ARE DEEPFAKES & WHY ARE THEY A CONCERN? Deepfakes use an AI models to manipulate or create hyper-realistic content that can deceive viewers. While some are harmless, many are used for malicious purposes, including: With deepfakes becoming more sophisticated, proving the difference between real and AI-generated content is getting harder. This raises major concerns for legal enforcement. IDENTIFYING DEEPFAKES – THE FIRST LEGAL HURDLE Before prosecuting deepfake crimes, the first challenge is proving that a piece of content is AIgenerated. This involves: Without solid proof, courts may struggle to convict perpetrators, allowing harmful deepfakes to spread unchecked. CHALLENGES IN PROSECUTING DEEPFAKE CASES IN INDIA Even when deepfakes are identified, prosecution faces multiple hurdles: Without AI-specific legal provisions, deepfake crimes often go unpunished. LEGAL PROVISIONS IN INDIA COVERING DEEPFAKES Since there are no deepfake-specific laws in India, cases rely on existing legal provisions: While these laws provide some protection, they do not fully address deepfake complexities. NEED FOR AI-SPECIFIC REGULATIONS To combat deepfake misuse effectively, governments and legal bodies must introduce AI-specific regulations: A proactive legal approach is essential to keep up with AI advancements. RECENT DEVELOPMENTS & FUTURE OF DEEPFAKE REGULATION India is gradually taking steps toward regulating AIgenerated content: As deepfake technology advances, Indian laws must evolve to ensure justice and accountability. CONCLUSION What are your thoughts on deepfake regulation in India? Should India introduce a dedicated deepfake law? Share your opinions below! Stay tuned for more legal insights!

DEEPFAKE LITIGATION: LEGAL CHALLENGES IN IDENTIFYING & PROSECUTING AIGENERATED FRAUD Read More »

The Intersection of Law and AI: A New Frontier

Leave a Comment / Blog, Tech & AI /

Introduction The legal sector is at a technological turning point with the rise of AI, poised to revolutionize forecasting and analytics. As AI integrates deeper into legal processes, a key question emerges: Could it replace human expertise in legal prediction? While AI excels in data processing, pattern recognition, and insights, Lawyers contribute indispensable skills like: The Rise of Predictive AI in Law Predictive AI is transforming legal analysis by leveraging data-driven insights from historical cases, judicial decisions, and legal trends. By analyzing vast databases of court rulings and precedents, AI identifies patterns and predicts outcomes with remarkable speed and accuracy. Modern AI systems mimic human reasoning and process millions of documents in seconds, uncovering subtle trends beyond human reach. By enhancing human expertise, predictive AI helps legal professionals make informed decisions, anticipate outcomes, and refine strategies, marking its growing importance in the future of legal analysis. Key Technological Capabilities AI revolutionizes legal analysis through four key capabilities: Limitations of Predictive AI Despite its capabilities, predictive AI has limitations that prevent it from replacing human lawyers: These limitations highlight the irreplaceable role of lawyers in ensuring justice with compassion and understanding. The Future of Law Collaborative Intelligence The most promising path forward lies not in replacing lawyers with AI, but in harnessing the power of collaborative intelligence. By combining the strengths of human legal expertise with the capabilities of predictive AI, we can create a more efficient, effective, and just legal system. Key Principles of Collaborative Intelligence Benefits of Collaborative Intelligence Conclusion Predictive AI is revolutionizing the litigation landscape, offering unparalleled analytical capabilities that are transforming the way lawyers work. While AI is unlikely to fully replace human lawyers in the foreseeable future, it will undoubtedly become an indispensable collaborative tool. Rather than pitting machine against human, the future of law lies in the powerful synergy between artificial intelligence and human expertise. By combining the strengths of both, lawyers can: In the future, AI will augment human capabilities, freeing lawyers to focus on higher-value tasks that require creativity, empathy, and complex problem-solving. As the legal profession continues to evolve, one thing is clear: the future of law is human-AI collaboration. As AI assumes a more prominent role in legal prediction, it’s likely that the profession will evolve into a collaborative model. Lawyers will work alongside AI systems to leverage their respective strengths and provide more accurate, efficient, and effective legal services. Ultimately, the future of legal prediction will depend on striking a balance between the capabilities of AI and the expertise of human lawyers. By embracing this synergy, the legal profession can harness the power of AI to enhance decision-making, improve outcomes, and deliver more value to clients Stay tuned for more legal insights!

The Intersection of Law and AI: A New Frontier Read More »

NCLT/NCLAT TRENDS IN IBC RULINGS: A YEAR IN REVIEW

Leave a Comment / Blog, Legal Updates /

– Somya Saxena, Associate The year has seen significant developments in insolvency jurisprudence under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC). Both the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) and the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) have played pivotal roles in shaping the interpretation and application of the IBC, ensuring a balance between creditor recoveries, corporate revival, and adherence to procedural fairness. This article exploresthe key trends and landmark rulings by NCLT/NCLAT over the past year and their implications for stakeholders. Strengthening the Creditor-In-Control Framework One of the cornerstones of the IBC is the principle of “creditor in control,” which vests decision-making power with the Committee of Creditors (CoC). NCLT/NCLAT rulings this year have consistently reinforced the supremacy of the CoC in approving resolution plans. Evolving Jurisprudence on Personal Guarantors The liability of personal guarantors to corporate debtors has been a major area of focus this year. With the Supreme Court’s decision in 2021 upholding the validity of personal guarantor provisions under the IBC, the NCLT/NCLAT have dealt with several cases clarifying the extent of personal guarantors’ liabilities. Addressing Delays and Procedural Bottlenecks While the IBC mandates a 330-day timeline for resolution, delays remain a recurring challenge. Over the past year, NCLT and NCLAT have taken a stricter stance against avoidable delays, emphasizing adherence to statutory timelines. Expedited Hearings: Tribunals have proactively prioritized insolvency matters and discouraged adjournments, except in extraordinary circumstances. In Jaypee Infratech Ltd., the NCLAT directed the CoC to ensure timely resolution by actively engaging with resolution applicants, reducing the scope for litigation-induced delays. Accountability for Delays: In cases like Committee of Creditors of Essar Steel v. Satish Kumar Gupta, tribunals highlighted the need for efficient coordination between stakeholders to prevent prolonged litigation. Additionally, rulings encouraged CoCs and resolution professionals (RPs) to streamline processes, such as quicker invitation and evaluation of bids. Cross-Border Insolvency and Group Insolvencies While India is yet to formally adopt the UNCITRAL Model Law on CrossBorder Insolvency, NCLT/NCLAT rulings have shown a growing willingness to address cross-border complexities and group insolvencies. Recognition of Foreign Proceedings: In the case of Jet Airways (India) Ltd., the NCLAT upheld cooperation between Indian and Dutch insolvency professionals, signaling progress toward cross-border insolvency norms. This case exemplifies the potential for harmonizing insolvency frameworks across jurisdictions, even in the absence of formal legislative mechanisms. Group Insolvencies: Tribunals have also dealt with cases involving insolveing corporate groups, where they emphasized the importance of consolidated resolution plans to maximize asset value. For instance, in the insolvency of Amtek Group companies, NCLT encouraged the CoC to develop holistic solutions rather than fragmenting the proceedings, to ensure coordinated recovery for stakeholders. Pre-Packaged Insolvency for MSMEs The introduction of the pre-packaged insolvency resolution process (PPIRP) for micro, small, and medium enterprises (MSMEs) has been a game-changer. NCLT has adjudicated several pre-pack cases this year, streamlining resolutions for distressed MSMEs. Key Approvals: In some landmark approvals, NCLT stressed the importance of faster resolutions under PPIRP while ensuring compliance with transparency and procedural requirements. This has encouraged wider adoption of pre-packs by MSMEs. Increasing Focus on Resolution Professional Accountability The conduct of resolution professionals (RPs) has been under scrutiny, with NCLT/NCLAT emphasizing their fiduciary duty and accountability. Liquidation vs. Revival Another key trend this year has been the tribunals’ nuanced approach toward liquidation cases. While resolution remains the preferred objective, NCLT/NCLAT have allowed liquidation where resolution is unviable. Conclusion The past year’s NCLT/NCLAT rulings highlight a maturing insolvency framework in India. These rulings reflect a consistent effort to uphold the objectives of the IBC while addressing evolving challenges, such as personal guarantor liabilities, cross-border insolvency, and procedural delays. Going forward, stakeholders can expect continued judicial guidance on complex insolvency issues, which will further strengthen the IBC’s role as a robust framework for corporate resolution and restructuring.

NCLT/NCLAT TRENDS IN IBC RULINGS: A YEAR IN REVIEW Read More »

Common Banking Compliance Issues and How to Avoid Them

Leave a Comment / Banking & Finance, Blog /

Common Compliance Issues Banks operate in an increasingly regulated and dynamic environment, requiring them to maintain operational excellence and prioritize client trust. Failure to address compliance challenges can lead to severe financial, legal, and reputational consequences. This presentation identifies key compliance issues faced by banks and explores actionable strategies to mitigate risks Anti-Money Laundering (AML) Compliance Banks must follow strict rules to prevent money laundering; non-compliance can lead to significant fines. In 2023 alone, regulators imposed billions in penalties for AML violations. Inadequate Customer Due Diligence (CDD) Inadequate customer verification processes expose banks to financial crimes. Regulatory enforcement for CDD violations has resulted in heavy fines. Emerging Challenges in ESG Compliance Banks are increasingly expected to align with Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) standards, introducing new compliance challenges. Data Privacy and Cyber-security Vulnerabilities The digitization of banking services has made banks’ prime targets for cyber threats. Breaches can compromise customer trust and legal compliance. Consumer Protection Violations Fair and transparent treatment of customers is a key statutory requirement. Violations can lead to regulatory scrutiny and reputational harm. Non-compliance with Sanctions Inadvertent dealings with sanctioned entities can result in severe penalties for banks. Difficulty Keeping Up with Regulatory Changes The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) plays a pivotal role in regulating and supervising banking operations in India. Non-compliance with its guidelines can lead to penalties, reputational damage, and operational restrictions. Conclusion By proactively addressing compliance challenges, banks can avoid penalties, build trust with regulators and customers, and demonstrate their commitment to ethical banking. Robust compliance strategies pave the way for operational integrity and longterm success. Stay tuned for more legal insights!

Common Banking Compliance Issues and How to Avoid Them Read More »

Emerging Role of MediationArbitration in Corporate Disputes

Leave a Comment / Blog, Corporate & Start Ups /

The Emerging Role of MedArb in Corporate Disputes Disputes are an inescapable part of corporate interactions in this dynamic world. Traditionally, they have been resolved through expensive and lengthy court proceedings. However, there is a new approach that is gaining momentum: Mediation-Arbitration, or Med-Arb. This hybrid form of dispute resolution is changing the way corporations handle disputes and resolve them, being more efficient, cost-effective, and relationship-preserving compared to traditional litigation. Understanding Med-Arb: A Hybrid Approach Mediation-arbitration is a sophisticated conflict resolution which, along with other processes, brings in two distinct processes: mediation in which a neutral third-party facilitator engages in exploring mutually acceptable solutions by attempting to help the disputing parties; and hence, going into arbitration if mediation fails, whereby a binding award will be given by the neutral arbitrator. Key Advantages of Med-Arb Legal Framework in India Industries Embracing Med-Arb Different industries are now largely embracing Med-Arb as a preferred method of dispute resolution for efficiency and the easy maintenance of relationships. Med-Arb vs. Traditional Arbitration Challenges in Med-Arb Conclusion Med-Arb has an influential future with corporate disputes. It is likely to be sought more by businesses seeking efficient, low-cost, and relationshippreserving means for conflict resolution. It would be a compelling alternative to litigation, since it combines the strengths of mediation and arbitration, and fulfils modern demands in flexibility for dispute management. With the evolution of this model, ethical considerations and procedural safeguards will be vital in assuring the integrity and effectiveness of this model vis-a-vis corporate disputes.

Emerging Role of MediationArbitration in Corporate Disputes Read More »

Implication of RBI’s Digital Guidelines for FinTech and NBFC

Leave a Comment / Blog, Corporate & Start Ups /

Introduction The Reserve Bank of India’s (RBI) Digital Lending Guidelines, introduced in September 2022, represent a significant regulatory shift aimed at ensuring not only responsible lending practices in the rapidly evolving digital lending landscape but also at enhancing consumer protection. These guidelines have profound implications for FinTech companies and Non-Banking Financial Companies (NBFCs) operating in India. Key Features of the Guidelines: The RBI’s Digital Guidelines will have a transformative effect on the way both fintech companies and NBFCs operate in India. While the guidelines impose certain compliance requirements, they also create an environment that supports responsible innovation and fosters growth in the digital finance ecosystem. Companies that can adapt quickly to these regulations while leveraging technology for customer benefit will be better positioned to succeed in the evolving landscape. However, those that fail to comply or integrate sound risk management practices may face penalties or operational difficulties, affecting their long-term sustainability. Implications for FinTech: RBI’s regulatory framework for fintech encompasses various aspects, including licensing, data protection, outsourcing, KYC, digital lending and customer due diligence Implication For NBFC Regulatory Scrutiny: NBFCs have to operate in a more stringent regulatory environment where adherence to the Digital Lending Guidelines is strictly monitored. Non-adherence may attract penalties or even restrictions on operations. Risk Management Enhancements: The requirement for NBFCs to follow sound credit assessment practices while utilizing FLDG arrangements may lead to improved risk management strategies, thereby reducing default rates and enhancing financial stability within the sector. Consumer Trust and Market Stability: These guidelines shall help build greater trust among borrowers by strengthening responsible lending practices and improved consumer protection measures, thus working towards market stability and growth in the digital lending ecosystem. Implementation Challenges: Conclusion RBI’s Digital Lending Guidelines represent a significant stride in making lending digitally transparent, accountable, and consumer-friendly. Challenging though these guidelines are to FinTechs and NBFCs, there’s a huge opportunity for growth in terms of innovation, thus winning the trust of customers for longterm use. Continued dialogue between regulators, financial institutions, and technology companies will be key to the success of these guidelines in finding a balance between financial innovation and consumer protection. Stay tuned for more legal insights!

Implication of RBI’s Digital Guidelines for FinTech and NBFC Read More »

Rise of the Digital Courtroom: E-Litigation in India

Leave a Comment / Blog, Tech & AI /

Understanding E- litigation E-litigation represents a paradigm shift in the Indian judiciary, seamlessly integrating new-age technology into traditional litigation processes. This transformative approach enables courts to digitize case filing, hearings, record management, and workflow, thereby enhancing the judicial system’s accessibility, efficiency, and transparency. Through the strategic deployment of digital tools, e-litigation facilitates expedited justice delivery among stakeholders, including litigants, lawyers, and judges. This modernized framework aims to revolutionize the Indian judiciary, ensuring a more streamlined, accountable, and citizencentric justice system. Movement towards E- litigation The COVID-19 pandemic presented an unprecedented opportunity for the Indian judiciary to adopt e-litigation. In response to lockdown restrictions, courts began exploring virtual platforms for hearings and filings. The Supreme Court of India has been instrumental in driving this initiative, launching projects such as e-courts and digitized case management systems under the National eGovernance Plan (NeGP). E-litigation offers numerous benefits, including enhanced efficiency, accessibility, and transparency. By minimizing delays and paperwork, e-litigation enables lawyers and litigants to save time and resources. Furthermore, advances in AI, blockchain, and cloud computing have made it possible to develop secure, efficient, and reliable e-litigation systems. Advantage of digital court The adoption of digital courts yields numerous advantages, including: Litigation platform in India Various e-litigation platforms have already been implemented to revolutionize the judicial process: Chalenges in E-litigation The increasing reliance on e-courts also raises concerns about unequal access to justice, as not everyone has the necessary resources, such as internet connectivity, digital literacy, and devices, to effectively participate in online legal proceedings. Digital Divide: The lack of access to technology, internet connectivity, and digital literacy in rural areas creates a significant barrier for litigants. Cyber Security and Privacy Concerns: The increased reliance on technology raises concerns about the security and privacy of sensitive legal data. Resistance to Change: The judiciary’s traditionalists often resist digital practices, citing lack of technical knowledge or preference for conventional methods. Infrastructure and Training Gaps: The successful implementation of e-litigation requires significant investments in robust IT infrastructure, as well as comprehensive training for judges, lawyers, and court staff. Conclusion The advent of legal technology has brought about a paradigm shift in the legal domain, empowering legal professionals to work more efficiently and effectively. Nevertheless, the integration of these technologies raises important ethical considerations. To ensure that technology is harnessed responsibly, legal professionals must be mindful of data privacy, cybersecurity, and the need to preserve the human element in legal practice. By exercising their professional judgment and expertise, legal professionals can leverage technology to augment their capabilities, improve service delivery, and ultimately enhance the administration of justice. Further, access to justice must be inclusive and equitable, regardless of one’s digital capabilities; therefore, it is crucial that we address the digital divide and ensure that no one is denied access to justice. Stay tuned for more legal insights!

Rise of the Digital Courtroom: E-Litigation in India Read More »

CYBER HARASSMENT AND DEFAMATION IN THE DIGITAL AGE: An Analysis of Recent Trends and Legal Challenges

Leave a Comment / Blog, Legal Updates, Tech & AI /

– Nitya Prabhakar, Associate The digital age has transformed communication, enabling instant connectivity and the widespread sharing of information. However, this evolution has also amplified malicious online behaviours, particularly digital defamation and cyber harassment. These phenomena pose significant legal and social challenges, often leaving victims struggling for redress in a rapidly evolving digital landscape. For instance, the cyberbullying of actress Rhea Chakraborty, following the death of Sushant Singh Rajput, highlighted how online platforms can turn into breeding grounds for defamatory and harassing behaviour. Social media trials and baseless accusations against her exemplified how unchecked digital abuse can devastate reputations and mental health, sparking debates about stricter cyberbullying laws. Similarly, the recent incidents such as targeted trolling of journalist Rana Ayyub for her opinions, a 16-year-old queer makeup artist facing severe homophobic bullying on Instagram after a viral post, and rising misuse of AI tools for harassment, emphasize the need for robust protections to ensure dignity and safety in the digital space. With the recent overhaul of India’s criminal laws under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (BNS), there is a need to explore how the legal framework addresses these challenges and how it can be further strengthened to ensure accountability in cyberspace. What Constitutes Digital Defamation and Cyber Harassment? Digital defamation refers to the act of publishing false and damaging statements about an individual or entity online. While defamation in its traditional sense is well-defined under Indian law, its digital counterpart takes unique forms, such as defamatory posts on social media, blogs, or emails. Under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, such offences are codified under Section 354, replacing the earlier Section 499 of the Indian Penal Code. The instantaneous and farreaching impact of digital defamation makes it a potent tool for reputational harm. Cyber harassment encompasses a spectrum of online behaviours designed to intimidate, humiliate, or harm individuals. These include cyberstalking, trolling, doxxing (publishing private information without consent), and the sharing of morphed or non-consensual images. Provisions under the BNS, such as Section 354F (cyberstalking) and Section 354H (insult to modesty), alongside sections of the Information Technology Act, 2000, provide legal recourse for victims of such harassment. The Legal Framework India has established a robust legal framework to address cybercrimes, primarily through the Information Technology Act, 2000 (IT Act) and subsequent amendments. Under the IT Act, provisions such as Section 66C deals with identity theft which directly address specific online offenses and Section 66E criminalizes the publication of private images without consent, while Section 67 and 67A penalize the transmission of obscene or sexually explicit material. The IT (Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) Rules, 2021, mandate social media platforms to establish grievance redress mechanisms, ensuring swift action against harmful content. Complementing these are legal provisions from the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (BNS). Importantly, cybercrimes have now been classified as an “organized crime” under Section 111 of the BNS. Additionally, Section 77, 78 and 79 of the BNS deals with cases assault against women i.e., voyeurism, stalking, and any word, gesture or act intended to insult modesty of a woman respectively. Furthermore, Section 351 deals with criminal intimidation, Section 352 pertains to intentional insult with intent to provoke breach of peace and Section 356 has expanded the scope of defamation to counteract emerging challenges. Moreover, the Protection of Children from Sexual Offenses Act, 2012 (POCSO) extends safeguards to minors against sexual abuse and exploitation online. Collectively, these laws aim to balance the right to free speech with the need for accountability and protection in the digital domain. Interestingly, the Supreme Court through its landmark judgment Shreya Singhal v. Union of India (2015) 5 SCC 1, struck down Section 66A of the IT Act which was deemed unconstitutional for curbing free speech. Yet, this judgment inadvertently created a vacuum in addressing online abuse, as Section 66A had provisions to tackle offensive or menacing messages online. This gap has left victims of cyber harassment, especially those targeted by coordinated online campaigns, with limited legal recourse. Key Challenges in Addressing Digital Defamation and Cyber Harassment One of the primary challenges in addressing digital offenses is jurisdictional ambiguity. The internet transcends geographical boundaries, and cases often involve perpetrators or servers located outside India. Determining the jurisdiction for legal proceedings and enforcing remedies in such scenarios can be complex and time-consuming. Another significant hurdle is the anonymity of offenders. Cybercriminals often exploit tools and techniques to mask their identities, making it difficult for law enforcement to trace them. Although investigative agencies possess advanced technologies to identify offenders, delays in cooperation from social media platforms and intermediaries often impede swift resolution. The challenge of balancing free speech with accountability also persists. India’s constitutional right to free speech under Article 19(1)(a) must be weighed against the need to protect individuals from defamation and harassment. Overregulation risks stifling legitimate expression, while under regulation may fail to safeguard victims. Additionally, India’s overburdened judiciary struggles to handle the increasing volume of cybercrime cases. Limited infrastructure and technical expertise within the judiciary lead to delayed adjudication, leaving victims vulnerable and offenders unpunished. Compounding these issues is the lack of public awareness, as many victims remain unaware of their legal rights or hesitate to report incidents due to stigma or fear of reprisal. Thus, the global and evolving nature of cybercrimes complicates prosecution and the victims often encounter frustration due to these impediments. Strengthening the Response to Digital Defamation and Cyber Harassment To combat digital defamation and cyber harassment effectively, there is a pressing need to enhance legislative provisions. The IT Act should be updated to explicitly address emerging forms of cyber harassment, such as doxxing and deepfake technologies. Additionally, a dedicated statute for digital defamation can provide a unified framework for addressing these issues, incorporating both civil and criminal remedies for victims. The social media platforms and online intermediaries must be held accountable and they should mandatorily deploy advanced AI tools to monitor harmful content which is circulated online. A robust mechanism for swift removal of defamatory or harassing material

CYBER HARASSMENT AND DEFAMATION IN THE DIGITAL AGE: An Analysis of Recent Trends and Legal Challenges Read More »

Scroll to Top