NM Law

Menu

nmlaw.co.in

PERSONAL GUARANTORS UNDER IBC:INCREASED RISKS FOR BUSINESS OWNERS

Leave a Comment / Blog /

– Shreya Shree Singh, Associate The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (‘IBC’), has significantly changed the landscape of corporate debt resolution in India. While the code primarily aims to streamline the insolvency process for corporate entities, it has also placed substantial liabilities on personal guarantors, often business owners or promoters. The increased risks for such individuals have been reinforced through judicial interpretations and legislative amendments. Legal Framework for Personal Guarantors The IBC was amended in 2019 to bring personal guarantors under its ambit, allowing creditors to initiate insolvency proceedings against them independently of corporate debtors. Key provisions relevant to personal guarantors include: Increased Risks for Business Owners The inclusion of personal guarantors under the IBC framework has heightenedfinancial risks for business owners. Some of the primary risks include: Comparative Analysis: Personal Guarantors in Other Jurisdictions The treatment of personal guarantors under insolvency law varies across jurisdictions: India’s approach under IBC appears to be more stringent compared to these jurisdictions, with fewer protective measures for personal guarantors. Mitigation Strategies for Business Owners While personal guarantees are often unavoidable in corporate finance, business owners can adopt several strategies to mitigate risks: Conclusion The inclusion of personal guarantors under IBC has heightened risks for business owners, making them personally accountable for corporate debts. Given the evolving legal landscape, business owners must adopt proactive measures to safeguard their financial interests and navigate the challenges posed by insolvency proceedings. Understanding the implications of personal guarantees and seeking expert guidance can help mitigate potential financial setbacks. As judicial interpretations continue to evolve, individuals providing personal guarantees must remain vigilant and well-informed about their rights and liabilities under IBC.

PERSONAL GUARANTORS UNDER IBC:INCREASED RISKS FOR BUSINESS OWNERS Read More »

ONLINE HARASSMENT & DIGITAL STALKING: THE EVOLVING LEGAL LANDSCAPE IN INDIA

Leave a Comment / Blog /

THE DIGITAL AGE AND ITS DARK SIDE The internet has transformed the way we connect, communicate, and share information. However, this digital revolution has also opened avenues for malicious activities such as cyberstalking, online harassment, and digital abuse. Perpetrators exploit technology to intimidate, threaten, and violate individuals’ privacy, inflicting psychological distress, reputational harm, and financial loss. Indian courts are increasingly recognizing the gravity of such offenses. By expanding legal interpretations and strengthening enforcement mechanisms, the judiciary is adapting to tackle the surge in cybercrimes. As digital threats escalate, the question arises: How effectively do Indian laws address these evolving challenges? LEGAL FRAMEWORK IN INDIA India has fortified its cyber laws to safeguard citizens from online threats. Key legal provisions include: Courts have also mandated that social media platforms act swiftly by removing offensive content within 24 hours of reporting to protect users from continued harm. CYBERSTALKING – AN EMERGING THREAT Cyberstalking refers to persistent and intrusive online behavior involving harassment, threats, or unwanted monitoring. Victims often endure anxiety, reputational damage, and heightened security risks. Landmark Case: State of Tamil Nadu v. Suhas Katti (2004) – India’s first cyberstalking conviction under the IT Act. The accused faced criminal charges for sending obscene messages online, establishing a crucial legal precedent that underscored the seriousness of digital stalking. COURTS & DIGITAL EVIDENCE Indian courts have adapted to technological advancements, now recognizing emails, social media records, IP logs, and other digital footprints as admissible evidence in legal proceedings. Notable Case: Shreya Singhal v. Union of India (2015) – The Supreme Court struck down Section 66A of the IT Act, which had been misused to suppress free speech. This landmark ruling emphasized the need for robust yet balanced cybercrime laws. Courts now actively promote the use of cyber forensic techniques to expedite investigations and ensure effective justice in digital harassment cases. RATE AT WHICH CYBER CRIME GROWING IN INDIA Daily Complaints: In May 2024, the Indian Cyber Crime Coordination Centre (I4C) reported an average of 7,000 cybercrime complaints per day, marking a 113.7% increase from 2021–2023 and a 60.9% rise from 2022–2023. Financial Losses: Between January and April 2024, Indians lost over ₹1,750 crore to cyber fraud, with significant losses attributed to investment scams, trading scams, and digital arrests. Annual Losses: In the first nine months of 2024, reported losses due to cyber fraud reached ₹11,333 crore, with stock trading scams accounting for ₹4,636 crore and investment-related scams resulting in ₹3,216 crore in losses. High-Value Fraud Cases: The number of cyber fraud cases involving amounts exceeding ₹1 lakh surged over four-fold in the fiscal year 2024, causing losses of $20 million. These statistics underscore the escalating threat of cybercrime in India, highlighting the urgent need for robust legal frameworks and proactive measures to protect individuals and organizations. LEGAL REMEDIES FOR VICTIMS Victims of online harassment in India can seek redress through the following steps: Additionally, courts have directed social media platforms to enhance content moderation policies, ensuring harmful content is identified and removed promptly. THE FUTURE OF CYBER LAW IN INDIA As digital threats like deepfakes, AI-driven fraud, and identity theft grow more sophisticated, India’s legal framework is evolving to stay ahead: While the legal system continues to adapt, fostering public awareness and ensuring stringent enforcement are crucial to creating a safer digital environment for all citizens. Stay tuned for more legal insights!

ONLINE HARASSMENT & DIGITAL STALKING: THE EVOLVING LEGAL LANDSCAPE IN INDIA Read More »

NAVIGATING DATALOCALIZATION LAWS:WHAT INDIANCOMPANIES NEED TOKNOW

Leave a Comment / Blog /

India’s data localization laws are evolving, impacting how businesses store and process data. The government mandates that specific data types remain within the country’s borders to enhance security and sovereignty. This has significant implications for companies handling sensitive user information. Understanding compliance requirements is crucial for businesses to avoid legal risks and operational disruptions. This carousel explores key aspects of data localization laws and their impact on Indian companies. WHAT ISDATA LOCALIZATION? Data localization refers to legal requirements that mandate businesses to store or process certain types of data within the country where it is collected. In India, sectors like banking, telecom, and ecommerce face strict localization rules. The goal is to strengthen national security, prevent foreign surveillance, and ensure better regulatory oversight. However, compliance comes with operational challenges and increased infrastructure costs for businesses. KEY INDIANDATA LOCALIZATION REGULATIONS Several laws and guidelines govern data localization in India: Companies operating in these sectors must align their data management practices with these regulations IMPACTON BUSINESSES Data localization refers to legal requirements that mandate businesses to store or process certain types of data within the country where it is collected. In India, sectors like banking, telecom, and ecommerce face strict localization rules. The goal is to strengthen national security, prevent foreign surveillance, and ensure better regulatory oversight. However, compliance comes with operational challenges and increased infrastructure costs for businesses. CHALLENGES IN IMPLEMENTATION Indian companies face several hurdles in complying with data localization laws: Companies must develop a robust data governance framework to navigate these challenges. STRATEGIES FOR COMPLIANCE To ensure compliance, businesses should: A proactive approach can help businesses align with laws while minimizing disruption. THE FUTUREOFDATA LOCALIZATIONININDIA With the Digital Personal Data Protection Act (DPDP Act) on the horizon, businesses must prepare for stricter compliance measures. The push for self-reliant digital infrastructure will continue, affecting global tech firms and Indian startups alike. Companies that embrace secure and localized data management practices will gain a competitive advantage while ensuring regulatory compliance. CONCLUSION & KEY TAKEAWAYS Stay ahead by prioritizing data security, compliance, and strategic planning!

NAVIGATING DATALOCALIZATION LAWS:WHAT INDIANCOMPANIES NEED TOKNOW Read More »

Legal Challenges in Digital-Only Banks & Neobanking

Leave a Comment / Blog /

Introduction The rise of digital-only banks and neobanks has revolutionized financial services, offering seamless, app based banking experiences. However, with innovation comes legal complexities. From compliance risks to data security concerns, navigating the regulatory landscape is a challenge. This carousel explores key legal hurdles neobanks and digital-only banks face and how they can mitigate risks. Licensing & Regulatory Compliance Unlike traditional banks, neobanks operate under varied regulatory frameworks—some hold full banking licenses, while others rely on partnerships with licensed financial institutions. Different countries have different regulatory approaches, making compliance a complex puzzle. Adhering to anti-money laundering (AML), Know Your Customer (KYC), and prudential norms is crucial for stability and consumer trust Data Privacy & Security Concerns Neobanks collect vast amounts of customer data, making them prime targets for cyber threats. Regulations like the GDPR (Europe), CCPA (California),and India’s DPDP Act mandate strict data protection measures. Failure to comply can lead to hefty fines and reputational damage. Ensuring secure transactions, encrypted communications, and transparent data policies is non-negotiable. Consumer Protection & Dispute Resolution Without physical branches, neobanks must ensure robust digital dispute resolution mechanisms. Issues like unauthorized transactions, hidden fees, and service disruptions raise concerns about customer rights. Many jurisdictions require digital banks to follow fair banking practices and establish effective grievance redressal frameworks. Fraud & Financial Crime Risks The digital nature of neobanks makes them vulnerable to fraud, identity theft, and financial crimes. Regulators enforce stringent AML and Counter-Terrorism Financing (CTF) laws to curb illicit activities. Implementing AI-driven fraud detection, real-time monitoring, and multi-layered authentication can help strengthen security and regulatory compliance. Partnership & Third Party Risks Many neobanks partner with traditional banks or fintech firms to offer services. These collaborations introduce legal risks related to liability, operational control, and compliance. Clear contractual agreements, regulatory oversight, and risk-sharing mechanisms are essential to prevent potential disputes and failures. Cross-Border Operations & Legal Complexity Neobanks often serve international customers, triggering cross-border regulatory challenges. Different financial laws, currency controls, and taxation rules create legal barriers. Ensuring multi-jurisdictional compliance through localized legal expertise is key to expanding global operations smoothly. Compliance with Evolving Fintech Regulations Regulators worldwide are continuously updating laws to address fintech risks. Key areas of focus include:– AI & Automated Decision-Making: Ensuring fairness and transparency inAI-driven credit decisions.– Crypto Regulations: Clarifying the role of neobanks in cryptocurrency services.– Open Banking & Data Sharing: Balancing regulatory requirements with consumer data protection. The Future of Legal Frameworks in Neobanking As digital banking evolves, regulators worldwide are adapting laws to address emerging risks. The future of neobanking depends on proactive legal strategies, transparent operations, and strong regulatory engagement. Digital-only banks must stay ahead by prioritizing compliance, security, and consumer protection to thrive in the fintech-driven era.

Legal Challenges in Digital-Only Banks & Neobanking Read More »

Impact of Group Insolvency on Holding & Subsidiary Companies: An Analysis in the Indian Context

Leave a Comment / Banking & Finance, Corporate & Start Ups /

Introduction Group insolvency refers to a situation where multiple entities within a corporate group face financial distress, leading to insolvency proceedings. In the Indian context, group insolvency is particularly significant given the intricate corporate structures comprising holding and subsidiary companies. While the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC) does not explicitly provide a framework for group insolvency, Indian courts and tribunals have attempted to address these issues through various judgments. This essay examines the impact of group insolvency on holding and subsidiary companies with reference to relevant Indian case law. Understanding Group Insolvency Corporate groups often consist of a holding company and multiple subsidiaries, which may be financially interdependent. When one entity within the group becomes insolvent, it can have cascading effects on the financial stability of other entities in the group. However, due to the principle of separate legal personality established in Salomon v. Salomon & Co. Ltd. (1897), courts generally treat each company as an independent legal entity. Despite this principle, Indian jurisprudence has evolved to recognize circumstances where the corporate veil may be lifted, especially in cases of fraud, intermingling of assets, or significant financial dependency between group entities. Impact of Group Insolvency on Holding & Subsidiary Companies 1. Consolidated Resolution Process Although the IBC does not explicitly provide for a consolidated insolvency resolution process for corporate groups, courts and tribunals have recognized the need for such an approach in certain cases. The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) in Videocon Industries Ltd. & Ors. v. State Bank of India & Ors. (2020) observed that since multiple entities in the Videocon Group were financially interdependent, a consolidated Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) was necessary to maximize value for stakeholders. This case set a precedent for considering group insolvency under Indian law. 2. Piercing the Corporate Veil In cases where holding and subsidiary companies operate as a single economic unit or where subsidiaries are merely alter egos of the parent company, courts have lifted the corporate veil to extend liability. The Supreme Court in ArcelorMittal India Pvt. Ltd. v. Satish Kumar Gupta & Ors. (2018) underscored the importance of looking beyond the legal entity in determining control and beneficial ownership, thereby setting a benchmark for cases involving holding-subsidiary relationships in insolvency proceedings. 3. Cross-Company Guarantees and Financial Interdependence A crucial aspect of group insolvency is the issue of cross-company guarantees. Often, subsidiaries provide guarantees for the debt obligations of their parent companies and vice versa. In IDBI Bank Ltd. v. Jaypee Infratech Ltd. (2019), the NCLAT examined the financial linkages between Jaypee Infratech and its parent company, Jaiprakash Associates Ltd. (JAL). Although insolvency proceedings were initiated against the subsidiary (Jaypee Infratech), the parent company was also scrutinized due to its financial involvement, demonstrating the interdependent nature of insolvency in group structures. 4. Intercompany Transactions and Avoidance Proceedings Group insolvency cases often involve related-party transactions, which may be scrutinized under Section 66 of the IBC (fraudulent and wrongful trading). In Swiss Ribbons Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors. (2019), the Supreme Court emphasized the necessity of preventing abusive transactions within group entities to protect creditors’ interests. Consequently, transactions between holding and subsidiary companies are examined closely during insolvency proceedings. 5. Challenges in Group Insolvency Despite judicial efforts, challenges persist in implementing a coherent group insolvency framework in India: · Lack of Explicit Legal Provisions: Unlike jurisdictions such as the UK and the US, India lacks statutory provisions addressing group insolvency comprehensively. · Jurisdictional Complexities: Different tribunals may oversee separate proceedings for different entities within the group, leading to inconsistencies in decision-making. · Stakeholder Conflicts: Creditors of individual entities may resist consolidation due to varying recovery prospects. Conclusion & The Way Forward The impact of group insolvency on holding and subsidiary companies in India is profound, particularly in cases of financial interdependence. While judicial decisions have paved the way for consolidated resolution processes and piercing the corporate veil in appropriate cases, there remains a pressing need for legislative intervention. The Insolvency Law Committee has proposed recommendations for a structured group insolvency framework, which, if implemented, could enhance efficiency and predictability in handling corporate group insolvencies. Until then, Indian courts and tribunals will continue to play a crucial role in shaping the jurisprudence of group insolvency.

Impact of Group Insolvency on Holding & Subsidiary Companies: An Analysis in the Indian Context Read More »

THE USE OF FORENSIC ACCOUNTING IN WHITE-COLLAR CRIME INVESTIGATIONS

Leave a Comment / Banking & Finance, Blog, Corporate & Start Ups /

– Somya Saxena, Associate White-collar crime refers to financially motivated, non-violent crimes committed by individuals, businesses, or government officials. In India, the rise of economic offenses, such as financial fraud, corporate scandals, and tax evasion, has necessitated the use of forensic accounting as a critical investigative tool. With increasing financial irregularities in banking, corporate, and government sectors, forensic accounting plays a pivotal role in maintaining transparency and accountability in financial systems. What is Forensic Accounting? Forensic accounting is a specialized field of accounting that involves investigating financial records, detecting fraud, and providing legal support in criminal and civil cases. It merges accounting, auditing, and investigative skills to uncover financial discrepancies and provide evidence in legal proceedings. The Reserve Bank of India (RBI), the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI), and other regulatory bodies rely on forensic accountants to detect financial crimes and enhance corporate governance. Recent Developments and Cases In a landmark decision, the Delhi High Court mandated an Amazon unit to pay $39 million in damages for infringing on the “Beverly Hills Polo Club” trademark. This ruling not only emphasizes the judiciary’s stance on protecting intellectual property rights but also highlights the necessity for meticulous financial scrutiny in ecommerce operations. Another significant case involves allegations against the Adani Group. U.S. authorities have charged members of the Adani family with orchestrating a $265 million bribery scheme to secure energy contracts in India. Forensic accountants have been instrumental in unraveling the complex financial transactions underpinning these allegations, showcasing the indispensable nature of forensic investigations in such high-profile cases. To bolster the fight against financial misconduct, the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI) introduced the Forensic Accounting and Investigation Standards (FAIS), effective from July 1, 2023. These standards provide a structured framework for professionals, ensuring consistency and integrity in forensic accounting practices. By adhering to FAIS, auditors and investigators can enhance the reliability of their findings, thereby strengthening the overall financial reporting ecosystem in India. Role of Forensic Accounting in White-Collar Crime Investigations in India Key Techniques Used in Forensic Accounting Notable White-Collar Crime Cases in India and Related Case Laws Challenges in Forensic Accounting in India Future of Forensic Accounting in India With rising financial crimes and corporate frauds, forensic accounting will play a crucial role in safeguarding the Indian economy. Government initiatives such as the Fugitive Economic Offenders Act, 2018, and digital forensic advancements will enhance the effectiveness of financial investigations. Increased collaboration between forensic experts, law enforcement agencies, and regulatory bodies will strengthen fraud detection and prevention mechanisms. Conclusion Forensic accounting is an essential tool in white-collar crime investigations in India. By leveraging advanced investigative techniques, forensic accountants help uncover fraud, support legal proceedings, and enhance corporate governance. As economic offenses continue to evolve, forensic accounting will remain vital in ensuring financial integrity and legal accountability in India’s corporate and banking sectors.

THE USE OF FORENSIC ACCOUNTING IN WHITE-COLLAR CRIME INVESTIGATIONS Read More »

Ethical Considerations in the Use of Technology in Litigation

Leave a Comment / Blog, Legal Updates /

Technology has completely reshaped the way litigation is handled, making legal research, case management, and evidence presentation more efficient than ever before. With tools like artificial intelligence (AI), electronic discovery (e-discovery), anddigital communication, lawyers can now work faster and more effectively. But withthese advancements come serious ethical concerns—confidentiality, accuracy, fairness, and professional responsibility are all at stake. Legal professionals need to be mindful of these challenges to uphold justice and preserve the integrity of the legal system. 1. Confidentiality and Data Security Confidentiality is one of the most fundamental principles in legal ethics. With so much client data stored and shared digitally, the risk of security breaches is real. To protect sensitive information, lawyers should: • Use encrypted communication channels and secure cloud storage. • Implement multi-factor authentication to keep unauthorized users out. • Stay compliant with data protection laws like the GDPR and India’s Information Technology Act, 2000. • Educate their teams and clients about cybersecurity best practices. 2. Staying Up to Date with Legal Technology Lawyers have a duty to keep up with the latest technology. This means: • Understanding how AI-powered research tools work and their limitations. • Keeping pace with blockchain, predictive analytics, and digital forensics. • Fact-checking AI-generated legal arguments to ensure accuracy. 3. Digital Evidence and the Risk of Deepfakes Technology has made digital evidence an essential part of many cases, but it also brings new risks. Deepfakes—AI-generated content that manipulates audio, video, or images— could be used to introduce false evidence. To avoid this: • Lawyers need to carefully verify digital evidence before presenting it in court. • Forensic tools should be used to check for alterations or manipulation. • Courts need stricter guidelines on the admissibility of AI-generated content. 4. The Dangers of AI Bias in Legal Decisions AI can help predict case outcomes, recommend sentences, and analyze legal documents, but these systems are only as good as the data they’re trained on. If the data is biased, the results will be too. To ensure fairness: • Lawyers should critically analyze AI-generated legal insights. • Transparency in AI decision-making processes should be prioritized. • AI tools should always be used with human oversight. 5. Ethical Use of Social Media in Litigation Social media is a goldmine for evidence, but lawyers must use it ethically. That means: • Avoiding deceptive tactics, like creating fake profiles to gather information. • Respecting client confidentiality and avoiding public discussions of cases. • Thinking about the potential consequences of online statements. 6. The Risk of Unauthorized Legal Practice Through AI AI-driven legal tools are becoming more common, but there’s a fine line between using technology for assistance and relying on it for actual legal advice. Lawyers should: • Ensure that AI-powered tools don’t cross into unauthorized legal practice. • Make sure clients understand that AI can’t replace a qualified attorney. • Follow all professional regulations regarding legal automation. 7. Ensuring AI-Generated Legal Content is Reliable Lawyers have faced penalties for submitting AI-generated legal documents with fake citations. This highlights the need for: • Verifying all AI-generated legal research before using it. • Cross-checking citations with primary sources. • Being mindful that AI tools are fallible and require human oversight. 8. Maintaining Professional Integrity in Tech-Driven Litigation The duty of candor extends to technology use in legal practice. Lawyers should: • Disclose when AI-generated content is used in court filings if necessary. • Ensure all electronic submissions comply with procedural rules. • Prevent AI misuse that could compromise legal integrity. Conclusion: Technology is transforming litigation in ways that make legal work more efficient and accessible. However, the ethical concerns that come with it—data security, AI bias, deepfake evidence, and more—can’t be ignored. Lawyers have a responsibility to balance technological innovation with professional integrity, ensuring that justice is served without compromising ethical standards. By staying informed, exercising caution, and upholding the core values of the legal profession, they can make the most of legal technology while preserving the integrity of the law.

Ethical Considerations in the Use of Technology in Litigation Read More »

DEEPFAKE LITIGATION: LEGAL CHALLENGES IN IDENTIFYING & PROSECUTING AIGENERATED FRAUD

Leave a Comment / Blog, Tech & AI /

LEGAL CHALLENGES IN IDENTIFYING & PROSECUTING AI-GENERATED FRAUD Deepfakes-AI-generated videos, images, or audio-are becoming a serious legal and security threat. They can be used for fraud, misinformation, identity theft, and even political manipulation. As technology advances, legal systems struggle to keep pace with AI-driven deception. Identifying, proving, and prosecuting deepfake crimes presents new challenges for law enforcement and courts worldwide. Let’s explore the key hurdles in deepfake litigation. WHAT ARE DEEPFAKES & WHY ARE THEY A CONCERN? Deepfakes use an AI models to manipulate or create hyper-realistic content that can deceive viewers. While some are harmless, many are used for malicious purposes, including: With deepfakes becoming more sophisticated, proving the difference between real and AI-generated content is getting harder. This raises major concerns for legal enforcement. IDENTIFYING DEEPFAKES – THE FIRST LEGAL HURDLE Before prosecuting deepfake crimes, the first challenge is proving that a piece of content is AIgenerated. This involves: Without solid proof, courts may struggle to convict perpetrators, allowing harmful deepfakes to spread unchecked. CHALLENGES IN PROSECUTING DEEPFAKE CASES IN INDIA Even when deepfakes are identified, prosecution faces multiple hurdles: Without AI-specific legal provisions, deepfake crimes often go unpunished. LEGAL PROVISIONS IN INDIA COVERING DEEPFAKES Since there are no deepfake-specific laws in India, cases rely on existing legal provisions: While these laws provide some protection, they do not fully address deepfake complexities. NEED FOR AI-SPECIFIC REGULATIONS To combat deepfake misuse effectively, governments and legal bodies must introduce AI-specific regulations: A proactive legal approach is essential to keep up with AI advancements. RECENT DEVELOPMENTS & FUTURE OF DEEPFAKE REGULATION India is gradually taking steps toward regulating AIgenerated content: As deepfake technology advances, Indian laws must evolve to ensure justice and accountability. CONCLUSION What are your thoughts on deepfake regulation in India? Should India introduce a dedicated deepfake law? Share your opinions below! Stay tuned for more legal insights!

DEEPFAKE LITIGATION: LEGAL CHALLENGES IN IDENTIFYING & PROSECUTING AIGENERATED FRAUD Read More »

The Intersection of Law and AI: A New Frontier

Leave a Comment / Blog, Tech & AI /

Introduction The legal sector is at a technological turning point with the rise of AI, poised to revolutionize forecasting and analytics. As AI integrates deeper into legal processes, a key question emerges: Could it replace human expertise in legal prediction? While AI excels in data processing, pattern recognition, and insights, Lawyers contribute indispensable skills like: The Rise of Predictive AI in Law Predictive AI is transforming legal analysis by leveraging data-driven insights from historical cases, judicial decisions, and legal trends. By analyzing vast databases of court rulings and precedents, AI identifies patterns and predicts outcomes with remarkable speed and accuracy. Modern AI systems mimic human reasoning and process millions of documents in seconds, uncovering subtle trends beyond human reach. By enhancing human expertise, predictive AI helps legal professionals make informed decisions, anticipate outcomes, and refine strategies, marking its growing importance in the future of legal analysis. Key Technological Capabilities AI revolutionizes legal analysis through four key capabilities: Limitations of Predictive AI Despite its capabilities, predictive AI has limitations that prevent it from replacing human lawyers: These limitations highlight the irreplaceable role of lawyers in ensuring justice with compassion and understanding. The Future of Law Collaborative Intelligence The most promising path forward lies not in replacing lawyers with AI, but in harnessing the power of collaborative intelligence. By combining the strengths of human legal expertise with the capabilities of predictive AI, we can create a more efficient, effective, and just legal system. Key Principles of Collaborative Intelligence Benefits of Collaborative Intelligence Conclusion Predictive AI is revolutionizing the litigation landscape, offering unparalleled analytical capabilities that are transforming the way lawyers work. While AI is unlikely to fully replace human lawyers in the foreseeable future, it will undoubtedly become an indispensable collaborative tool. Rather than pitting machine against human, the future of law lies in the powerful synergy between artificial intelligence and human expertise. By combining the strengths of both, lawyers can: In the future, AI will augment human capabilities, freeing lawyers to focus on higher-value tasks that require creativity, empathy, and complex problem-solving. As the legal profession continues to evolve, one thing is clear: the future of law is human-AI collaboration. As AI assumes a more prominent role in legal prediction, it’s likely that the profession will evolve into a collaborative model. Lawyers will work alongside AI systems to leverage their respective strengths and provide more accurate, efficient, and effective legal services. Ultimately, the future of legal prediction will depend on striking a balance between the capabilities of AI and the expertise of human lawyers. By embracing this synergy, the legal profession can harness the power of AI to enhance decision-making, improve outcomes, and deliver more value to clients Stay tuned for more legal insights!

The Intersection of Law and AI: A New Frontier Read More »

NCLT/NCLAT TRENDS IN IBC RULINGS: A YEAR IN REVIEW

Leave a Comment / Blog, Legal Updates /

– Somya Saxena, Associate The year has seen significant developments in insolvency jurisprudence under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC). Both the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) and the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) have played pivotal roles in shaping the interpretation and application of the IBC, ensuring a balance between creditor recoveries, corporate revival, and adherence to procedural fairness. This article exploresthe key trends and landmark rulings by NCLT/NCLAT over the past year and their implications for stakeholders. Strengthening the Creditor-In-Control Framework One of the cornerstones of the IBC is the principle of “creditor in control,” which vests decision-making power with the Committee of Creditors (CoC). NCLT/NCLAT rulings this year have consistently reinforced the supremacy of the CoC in approving resolution plans. Evolving Jurisprudence on Personal Guarantors The liability of personal guarantors to corporate debtors has been a major area of focus this year. With the Supreme Court’s decision in 2021 upholding the validity of personal guarantor provisions under the IBC, the NCLT/NCLAT have dealt with several cases clarifying the extent of personal guarantors’ liabilities. Addressing Delays and Procedural Bottlenecks While the IBC mandates a 330-day timeline for resolution, delays remain a recurring challenge. Over the past year, NCLT and NCLAT have taken a stricter stance against avoidable delays, emphasizing adherence to statutory timelines. Expedited Hearings: Tribunals have proactively prioritized insolvency matters and discouraged adjournments, except in extraordinary circumstances. In Jaypee Infratech Ltd., the NCLAT directed the CoC to ensure timely resolution by actively engaging with resolution applicants, reducing the scope for litigation-induced delays. Accountability for Delays: In cases like Committee of Creditors of Essar Steel v. Satish Kumar Gupta, tribunals highlighted the need for efficient coordination between stakeholders to prevent prolonged litigation. Additionally, rulings encouraged CoCs and resolution professionals (RPs) to streamline processes, such as quicker invitation and evaluation of bids. Cross-Border Insolvency and Group Insolvencies While India is yet to formally adopt the UNCITRAL Model Law on CrossBorder Insolvency, NCLT/NCLAT rulings have shown a growing willingness to address cross-border complexities and group insolvencies. Recognition of Foreign Proceedings: In the case of Jet Airways (India) Ltd., the NCLAT upheld cooperation between Indian and Dutch insolvency professionals, signaling progress toward cross-border insolvency norms. This case exemplifies the potential for harmonizing insolvency frameworks across jurisdictions, even in the absence of formal legislative mechanisms. Group Insolvencies: Tribunals have also dealt with cases involving insolveing corporate groups, where they emphasized the importance of consolidated resolution plans to maximize asset value. For instance, in the insolvency of Amtek Group companies, NCLT encouraged the CoC to develop holistic solutions rather than fragmenting the proceedings, to ensure coordinated recovery for stakeholders. Pre-Packaged Insolvency for MSMEs The introduction of the pre-packaged insolvency resolution process (PPIRP) for micro, small, and medium enterprises (MSMEs) has been a game-changer. NCLT has adjudicated several pre-pack cases this year, streamlining resolutions for distressed MSMEs. Key Approvals: In some landmark approvals, NCLT stressed the importance of faster resolutions under PPIRP while ensuring compliance with transparency and procedural requirements. This has encouraged wider adoption of pre-packs by MSMEs. Increasing Focus on Resolution Professional Accountability The conduct of resolution professionals (RPs) has been under scrutiny, with NCLT/NCLAT emphasizing their fiduciary duty and accountability. Liquidation vs. Revival Another key trend this year has been the tribunals’ nuanced approach toward liquidation cases. While resolution remains the preferred objective, NCLT/NCLAT have allowed liquidation where resolution is unviable. Conclusion The past year’s NCLT/NCLAT rulings highlight a maturing insolvency framework in India. These rulings reflect a consistent effort to uphold the objectives of the IBC while addressing evolving challenges, such as personal guarantor liabilities, cross-border insolvency, and procedural delays. Going forward, stakeholders can expect continued judicial guidance on complex insolvency issues, which will further strengthen the IBC’s role as a robust framework for corporate resolution and restructuring.

NCLT/NCLAT TRENDS IN IBC RULINGS: A YEAR IN REVIEW Read More »

Scroll to Top